Jon & John

by

I’m a wee bit miffed that Jon Cruddas isn’t throwing his hat in the leadership ring, but I’m not surprised and frankly don’t blame him.

The refreshingly modest Cruddas admitted that he probably didn’t have the qualities needed to be leader of the Labour Party and wannabe PM. He wants to maintain a semblance of ‘normal’ human life and lacks the ambition and slight narcissism needed to get right to the top.

Anyway, as much as I wanted Cruddas contributing his ideas to the leadership debates I could not say with great certainty that I intended to vote for him. 

I simply hope that he has a central role to play in reforming the Labour Party over the next few years. I thought that having him as a candidate would force the more likely future leaders to discuss class and inequality and that the publicity generated by even an unsuccessful Cruddas leadership campaign would put him in good stead for the Shadow Cabinet elections.

So sans Jean le Cruddas it seems we’ll be left with Milibands, Balls and Burnham. All served in Government. Each comes with various advantages and disadvantages but in terms of ideology there’s not a huge amount to distinguish them.

Therefore, I am tempted to agree with Don Paskini’s argument that John McDonnell should be nominated for the leadership.

It seems to me that we members deserve to be given a proper choice; it would be healthy for the other candidates to be arguing with someone who comes from outside their political comfort zone; and McDonnell may even be able to make a convincing case for the relevance and electability of Labour leftism.

Of course much of the press would revel in criticising a McDonnell candidacy as evidence that Labour is lurching dangerously to the left. But an election featuring only Milibands, Balls and Burnham may equally be slammed for being dull. Plus the bastards in the press have spent the last few years demonising Labour anyway so I don’t think we should let them scare us away from holding a genuinely open and interesting contest.

Advertisements

One Response to “Jon & John”

  1. Labour and its leadership, part 2 « Though Cowards Flinch Says:

    […] right foot, ahem, by blaming Labour’s defeat on immigrants) I can imagine a few MPs and their correlatives among the membership being a little despondent. All of the above characters are tainted by association with New Labour, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: